All rights reserved re common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, MICHEAL LEE GREEN©

Copyright Notice

Copyright Notice: All rights reserved re common-law copyright of trade-name/trade-mark, MICHEAL LEE GREEN© as well as any and all derivatives and variation in the spelling of said trade-name/trade-mark – Common Law Copyright © 2011 by Seqen Rekhtu Bey©. Said common-law trade-name/trade-mark, MICHAEL LEE GREEN/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, may neither be used, nor reproduced, neither in whole nor in part, nor in any manner whatsoever, without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgement of Seqen Rekhtu Bey© as signified by the red-ink, blue-ink, black-ink signature of Seqen Rekhtu Bey©, hereinafter “Secured Party”. With the intent of being contractually bound, any juristic person, as well as the agent of said juristic person, consents and agrees by this Copyright Notice that neither said juristic person, nor the agent of said juristic person, shall display, nor otherwise use in any manner, the common-law trade-name/trade-mark MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY© nor the common-law copyright described herein, nor any derivative of, nor any variation in the spelling of, MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY© without the prior, express, written consent and acknowledgment of Secured Party, as signified by Secured Party’s signature in red ink. Secured Party neither grants nor implies, nor otherwise gives consent for any unauthorized use of MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, and all such unauthorized use is strictly prohibited. Secured Party is not now, nor has Secured Party ever been an accommodation party, nor a surety, for the purported debtor, i.e. “MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©”, nor for any derivative of, nor for any variation in the spelling of, said name, nor for any other juristic person, and is so-indemnified and held harmless by Debtor, i.e. “MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©”, in Hold harmless and Indemnity Agreement No. SRB-112977-HHIA dated the Third Day of the Sixth Month in the Year of Our Lord One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Eight against any and all summonses, lawsuits, costs, fines, liens, levies, penalties, damages, interests, and expenses whatsoever, both absolute and contingent as are due and as might become due, now existing and as might hereafter arise, and as might be suffered by, imposed on, and incurred by Debtor for any and every reason, purpose, and cause whatsoever. Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: By this Copyright Notice both the juristic person and the agent of said juristic person, hereinafter jointly and severally “User”, consent and agree that any use of MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY© other than authorized use as set forth above constitutes unauthorized use, counterfeiting, of Secured Party’s common-law copyrighted property, contractually binds User, renders this Copyright Notice a Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY© is Secured Party, and signifies that User: (1) grants Secured Party a security interest in all of User’s assets, land, and personal property, and all of User’s interest in assets, land and personal property, in the sum certain amount of $500,000.00 per each occurrence of use of the common-law-copyrighted trade-name/trade-mark MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, as well as for each and every occurrence of use of any and all derivatives of, and variation in the spelling of, MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, plus costs, plus triple damages; (2) authenticates this Security Agreement wherein User is debtor and Seqen Rekhtu Bey© is Secured Party, and wherein User pledges all of User’s assets, land, consumer goods, farm products, inventory, equipment, money, investment property, commercial tort claims, letters of credit, letter-of-credit rights, chattel paper, instruments, deposit accounts, accounts, documents, and general intangibles, and all User’s interest in all such foregoing property, now owned and hereafter acquired, now existing and hereafter arising, and wherever located, as collateral for securing User’s contractual obligation in favor of Secured Party for User’s unauthorized use of Secured Party’s common-law-copyrighted property; (3) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of a UCC Financing Statement in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorder’s office, wherein User is debtor and Seqen Rekhtu Bey is Secured Party; (4) consents and agrees that said UCC Financing Statement described above in paragraph “(3)” is a continuing financing statement, and further consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any continuation statement necessary for maintaining Secured Party’s perfected security interest in all of User’s property and interest in property, pledged as collateral in this Security Agreement and described above in paragraph “(2)”, until User’s contractual obligation theretofore incurred has been fully satisfied; (5) consents and agrees with Secured Party’s filing of any UCC Financing Statement, as described above in paragraphs “(3)” and “(4)” as well as the filing of any Security Agreement, as described above in paragraph “(2)”, in the UCC filing office, as well as in any county recorders’ office; (6) consents and agrees that any and all such filings described in paragraphs “(4)” and “(5)” above are not, and may not be considered, bogus, and that User will not claim that any such filing is bogus; (7) waives all defenses; and (8) appoints Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User’s default re User’s contractual obligations in favor of Secured Party as set forth below under “Payment Terms” and “Default Terms”, granting Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, and User further consents and agrees that this appointment of Secured Party as Authorized Representative for User, effective upon User’s default, is irrevocable and coupled with a security interest. User further consents and agrees with all of the following additional terms of Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use: Payment Terms: In accordance with fees for unauthorized use of MICHAEL LEE GREEN/SEQEN REKHTU BEY© as set forth above, User hereby consents and agrees that User shall pay Secured Party all unauthorized-use fees in full within ten (10) days of the date User is sent Secured Party’s invoice, hereinafter “Invoice”, itemizing said fees. Default Terms: In event of non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees by User within ten (10) days of date invoice is sent, User shall be deemed in default and: (a) all of User’s property and property pledged as collateral by User, as set forth in above in paragraph “(2)”, immediately becomes, i.e. is, property of Secured Party; (b) Secured Party is appointed User’s Authorized Representative as set forth above in paragraph “(8)”; and (c) User consents and agrees that Secured Party may take possession of, as well as otherwise dispose of in any manner that Secured Party, in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate, including, but not limited by, sale at auction, at any time following User’s default, and without further notice, any and all of User’s property and interest, described above in paragraph “(2)”, formerly pledged as collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, in respect of this “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use,” that Secured Party, again in Secured Party’s sole discretion, deems appropriate. Terms for Curing Default: Upon event of default, as set forth above under “Default Terms”, irrespective of any and all of User’s former property and interest in property, described above in paragraph “(2)”, in the possession of, as well as disposed of by, Secured Party, as authorized above under “Default Terms”, User may cure User’s default only re the remainder of User’s said former property and interest property, formerly pledged as collateral that is neither in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party within ten (10) days of date of User’s default only by payment in full. Terms of Strict Foreclosure: User’s non-payment in full of all unauthorized-use fees itemized in Invoice within said ten (10) day period for curing default as set forth above under “Terms for Curing Default” authorizes Secured Party’s immediate non-judicial strict foreclosure on any and all remaining former property and interest in property, formerly pledged as collateral by User, now property of Secured Party, which is not in the possession of, nor otherwise disposed of by, Secured Party upon expiration of said ten (10) day default-curing period. Ownership subject to common-law copyright and UCC Financing Statement and Security Agreement filed with the UCC filing office. Record Owner: MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, Autograph Common Law Copyright © 2011. Unauthorized use of “Seqen Rekhtu Bey©” incurs same unauthorized-use fees as those associated with MICHAEL LEE GREEN©/SEQEN REKHTU BEY©, as set forth above in paragraph “(1)” under “Self-executing Contract/Security Agreement in Event of Unauthorized Use.”

Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.
Moorish Divine National Movement of North America
CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE FOR
STATE OF OHIO
DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VECHIAL
DMV

RECORDING REQUESTED BY: > > c/o Seqen Rekhtu Bey©> > near ____________________________________, Charlotte, NC Near_______ Washitaw, u.s.A, Postal Zone ~ [ ] Non-Domestic > > > RIGHT TO TRAVEL > > “All Sovereign, private civilian inhabitants shall have free access to all judicial courts of the several states. All clerks and / or deputy shall file all documents of paper for any and / or all-sovereign, private civilian inhabitants; free and without charge of fees.” – AMERICA SUPREME COURT CASE - Crandall vs. State of Nevada, 73 U.S. 35 > > > > According to the “CONSTITUTION OF THE STATE OF OHIO, Article I, §2: It states, “Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.”



SPACE ABOVE THIS LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY

AFFIDAVIT: Right to Travel > > According to the “UNITED NATION UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS,” > Article 13. > (1) Everyone has the right to freedom of movement and residence within the borders of each state. > (2) Everyone has the right to leave any country, including his own, and to return to his country. > > According to the Constitution of the State of Ohio, Article I, §2: It states, > “Sovereignty of the people. All political power is vested in and derived from the people; all government of right originates from the people, is founded upon their will only, and is instituted solely for the good of the whole.” > > Therefore, as a member of the Sovereignty of the people, I am not only entitled to use the highways and byways in the so-called United States of America, I have an inalienable right to use the highways, byways and even waterways without being under duress. > > "The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right." Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941. > > > KNOW ALL MEN AND WOMEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey©, in Propria persona IN BEING FIRST DULY SWORN AN OATH, deposes and says: > > > I AM Seqen Rekhtu Bey©, Non-Combatant, Non-Military, Non-Corporate/Commercial; explicitly distinguished from MICHAEL LEE GREEN© (ANY AND ALL DERIVATIVES AND DARIVATIONS), a (fictitious) artificial - corporate entities Jus Postliminii, ALL RIGHTS RESTORED AND RESERVED. I Am a natural born (indigenous) sovereign (state), an original inhabitant of the Americas (Al Morocs / Amexems) and a Free Moorish Sovereign and member of Moorish National Divine Movement, in covenant with Allah and Father Abraham and his Mu’urish Empire through The Holy Prophet Noble Drew Ali and Love, Truth, Peace, Freedom and Justice. The PROPHET has assigned us FORM: 1099-No. 10105905. > > According to the United States Supreme Acts of State to wit: > > “Every Sovereign State (people) is bound to respect the independence of every other Sovereign State (people) and the courts of one country (people) will NOT sit in judgment on the acts of the government of another, done within (the same or) it own territory…” > > According to the “DRAFT DECLARATION ON THE RIGHTS OF INDIGENOUS PEOPLES; COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS”; Sub-Commission on Prevention of Discrimination and Protection of Minorities Forty-fifth session. > > Article 31. > “Indigenous peoples, as a specific form of exercising their right to self determination, have the right autonomy or self-government in matters relating to their internal and local affairs, including culture, religion, education, information, media, health, housing, employment, social welfare, economic activities, land and resource management, environment and entry by non-members, as well as, ways and means for financing these autonomous functions.” > > Article 32. > “Indigenous peoples have the collective right to determine their own Citizenship in accordance with their customs and traditions. Indigenous Citizenship does NOT impair the RIGHT of indigenous individuals to obtain Citizenship of the State in which they live.” > > Therefore, I AM a Moorish National of the Land Created by Allah now called the Continental united states of America (Al Moroc - 1787): I AM to domiciled to ALL 48 states, in particularly, domiciled in the sovereign state of Ohio at Republic, c/o ______________________, Charlotte, NC Near_________________, Ohio Republic, Postal Zone ~ [ ] Non Domestic. I AM domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction to both the corporate State and federal governments. For I AM NOT a citizen governed under naturalization or immigration, NOR AM I, a 14th Amendment “person” or “U.S. citizen” and NOT subject to the statutory, colorable law jurisdiction of the United States in the corporate monopoly of the federal, State, local and municipal governments. The City and County Traffic Courts only have jurisdiction to both the corporate and commercial matters, and the commercial use of “Motor Vehicles” on public highways and streets, as defined by Federal law (18 USC 31). The City and County Traffic Courts are NOT, nor ever have been > authorized to assume jurisdiction over the general public’s ordinary travel on the public highways and streets. In fact, City and County Traffic Courts that try traffic cases are NOT courts of law recognized by either the Constitution for the united states of America (1791) or ANY State Constitution. Unless otherwise, stated, I have individual knowledge of the matters contained within this Affidavit. I am fully competent to testify with respect to these matters. I have NOT knowingly or willingly waived ANY of my UNALIENABLE RIGHTS. American case law has clearly adjudicated that: > > “The use of the highways for the purpose of TRAVEL and transportation is NOT a mere privilege, but a common and fundamental RIGHT, of which the public and individuals can NOT be encroached upon by private individuals or corporations. Moreover, streets and highways are for the use of the public in general passage and traffic without distinction, and ALL persons have an equal RIGHT TO use them for purposes for TRAVEL by proper means, and with due regard for the corresponding RIGHTS of others.” - 25 Am. Jur. (1st) Highways Sect. 163. pg. 457 > > “The RIGHT of the Citizen TO TRAVEL upon the public highways and to transport his/her property thereon either by carriage or automobile, is NOT a mere privilege, which a city [or State] may prohibit or permit at will, but a common RIGHT, which he/she has under the RIGHT to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” - Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579 > > “Even the legislature has NO power to deny to a Citizen the RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon the highway and transport his/her property in the ordinary course of his/her business or pleasure, though this RIGHT may be regulated in accordance with the public interest and convenience.” [“Regulated,” means traffic safety enforcement, stop lights, signs etc.] - Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 22 > > > That I have researched extensively the organic laws of the united states of America, including two hundred years of American case law (i.e., Common Law), and affirm that I have secured the UNALIENABLE and FUNDAMENTAL, UNRESTRICTED and UNREGULATED RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon both the public walkways and the highways, and transport my personal and allodial property, duly conveyed, unhindered by ANY private, corporate or statutory law, or Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regulation or so-called requirement. This unalienable RIGHT TO TRAVEL is guaranteed by the 9th & 10th Amendments of the organic Constitution for the united states of America and Bill of Rights, and upheld by many court decisions in support of that right. I, now explicitly RESERVE, ASSERT and DEFEND that right. > “The RIGHT TO TRAVEL is an unconditional personal right whose exercise may NOT be conditioned.” - Dunn v. Blumstein, 405 U.S. 330, 92 S Ct 995, 31 L Ed 2d 274. [5 U.S. Dig, Constitutional Law, and 101.5, Right of interstate of international travel.] > > > This AFFIDAVIT is submitted upon demand of a driver’s license, registration or proof of insurance as part of the official record of ANY ensuing action and must be introduced as evidence in said action. > “NO State entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, NOR waterways…transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation, i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCE.” - Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 III. 200, 169 N. E. 22. > > “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade, or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state. NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED OF THE NATURAL INDIVIDUAL TRAVELING FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS, PLEASURE AND TRANSPORTATION.” - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 [1972] > > > that I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey do NOT under ANY circumstances; utilize the public highways for commercial purposes. Once again, I am NOT a 14th Amendment legal “person” engaged in interstate commerce, NOR do I derive income from driving and/or transporting of goods. I am NOT a “driver,” NOR am I an “operator” of a “motor vehicle.” I AM a navigator, "a traveler” and a “traveler” places NO charge upon other(s) traveling with him or her. A Moorish American Citizens own private automobiles or "land port vehicle," such as, cars, jeeps, trucks and etc… In fact, once the automobile becomes private property, it too becomes protected under the 5th Amendment to the Constitution for the united states of America… > “No person (individual) shall…be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” - Article v. Amendment > > “The RIGHTS of the Citizen TO TRAVEL upon the public highways and to transport his/her property there on by carriage or automobile, is NOT a mere privilege, which a city (or state) may prohibit or permit at will, but a Common Right, which he/she has under the RIGHT TO LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS.” - Thompson v. Smith 154SE579 > > > Thus, there is a difference between a traveler and a driver. The driver’s license is for motor vehicles involved in commerce only, such as, Taxi Cabs, UPS Trucks, Motor Coach (Buses), Airplanes and 18-wheel Tractor-Trailer Trucks. “Motor Vehicle” therefore, can be defined as, every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and passengers and property, or property and cargo; “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of person or property for any fare, fee, rate, charges, or other consideration, or directly or indirectly, in connection with any business, other undertaking for profit.” My private, self-propelled contrivance/carriage is NOT involved in commerce; therefore, it is NOT a “motor vehicle.” The corporate State of Ohio Department of Motor Vehicle code does NOT disclose the true intent and purpose of the statutes, though a motor vehicle” is adequately and clearly defined in the United States Code (USC). > “Motor Vehicle means every description of carriage other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes.” – “18 USC 31” > > Thus, ONLY corporations can make FRN's (fiat notes) from the use of the motor vehicles. > > “Thus, ONLY corporations can make money from the use of motor vehicles. The privilege of using the streets and highways by the operation thereon of motor carriers for hire can be acquired only by permission or license from the state or its political subdivision.” – Title 18, United States Code, Section 31. > > 5. Therefore, I can NOT in good faith apply for and accept a driver’s license, as I would be committing PERJURY. I AFFIRM that I am a member of, citizen of, franchise of, or resident (agent) of [judiciary, surety for] the corporate “State of Ohio,” when the already established facts by affidavit have evidenced that I am NOT a member of, citizen of, franchise of, or resident (agent) of the corporate “State of Ohio” or the federal United States (incorporated). > > 6. Therefore, I have determined and hereby affirm by AFFIDAVIT and under affirmation, by virtue of my declared sovereign state Citizenship and American case law, that I am NOT required to have government permission to travel; NOT required to have a driver’s license from the non-profit private corporation DMV; NOT required to have vehicle registration of my personal property, NOR to surrender the lawful title of my duly conveyed property to the State as security against government indebtedness and the undeclared federal bankruptcy. ANY administrative rule, regulation or statutory act of ANY State legislature or judicial tribunal to the contrary is unlawful and clearly unconstitutional, thus NULL and VOID. American case law has clearly adjudicated that: > > “ALL laws, which are repugnant to the Constitution, are NULL and VOID.” > - Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 > > “Statutes that violate the plain and obvious principles of common right and common reason are NULL and VOID.” > - Bennett v. Boggs, 1 Baldw 60 > > “Where RIGHTS secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” > - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. > > “The state can NOT diminish RIGHTS of the people” > – Hertado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 > > “There can be NO sanction or penalty imposed upon one because of this exercise of constitutional RIGHTS. - Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 945 > > “The claim and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be converted into a CRIME.” – Miller v. U. S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > > 7. Thus, ANY action involving a citation or ticket issued confiscation, impoundment or search and seizure of my private property by a police officer or ANY other public servant or employee, which carries a fine or jail time, is a penalty or sanction, thus converting a RIGHT into a crime. ANY citation or ticket is thus, NULL and VOID. Under every circumstance without exception, government officials must hold the Constitution for the united states of America (1791) supreme over ANY other laws, regulations or orders. Every police (executive) officer or judicial officer has SWORN AN OATH, an oath to protect the lives, property and RIGHTS of the citizens of the united states of America under the supreme law of the land. ANY act to deprive state Citizens of their constitutionally protected RIGHTS is a direct violation of their oath of office, a felony and a federal crime. > > “A State (or the U.S.) may NOT impose a CHARGE for the enjoyment of a RIGHT granted by the Federal Constitution.” - Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 > > “REGULATIONS, FEES, TAXES, MAY NOT BE APPLIED TO NATURAL PERSON USING COMMON HIGHWAYS, as it is in derogation of common right of public to use highways as an avenue upon, which vehicles for transportation of goods, passengers, freight and traffic of all kinds may be freely moved, having due regard for rights of others, while this, or other provisions of statute, should be fairly, liberally construed to promote the effect and the evident purpose for which it was intended, care should be exercised not to unduly extend it’s effect.” > - Young v. Madison County, 115 N. > > 8. ANY action by a police (executive) officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to assert unlawful authority under the “color of law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my constitutionally protected RIGHTS (1787), and will be prosecuted to the full extent of American law. > > "The police power of the state must be exercised in subordination to the provisions of the U.S. Constitution." Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Co. vs. State Highway Commission, 294 US 613; Bacahanan vs. Wanley, 245 US 60. > > "It is well settled that the Constitutional Rights protected from invasion by the police power, include Rights safeguarded both by express and implied prohibitions in the Constitutions." Tiche vs. Osborne, 131 A. 60. > > "As a rule, fundamental limitations of regulations under the police power are found in the spirit of the Constitutions, not in the letter, although they are just as efficient as if expressed in the clearest language." Mehlos vs. Milwaukee, 146 NW 882. > > “Public officials are NOT immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading constitutional RIGHTS.” - AFLCIO v. Woodward, 406 F2d 137 t. > > “Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, Territory, or District to the deprivation of ANY rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution of laws of the United States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both…” – 18 USC 242 > > "This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof...shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or laws of any State to the Contrary not one word withstanding... The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by OATH or AFFIRMATION, to support this Constitution;” – Constitution for the united states of America, Article 6 > > 9. This AFFIDAVIT also certifies that I have previously completed and passed a test measuring my competency to safely control an automobile vehicle upon the public highways within the united states of America. I have also met or exceeded all common sense requirements concerning the “rules of the road” and the ability to maneuver an automobile vehicle in a safe and responsible manner. > > PERJURY JURAT > > Pursuant to Title 28, USC 1746 (1) and executed “without the united states of American,” I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey, affirm under penalty of perjury under the laws of the united states of America that the foregoing is true and correct, to the best of my informed knowledge. And further deponent saith not. I now affix my autograph and official seal to all of the above affirmations > > Respectfully, > > > L.S. Citizen/Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, preceding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special > > > National Seal: > > > Sworn, subscribed, sealed and affirmed before me this day of 2011. > > Notary Public for Colorado/Ohio Republic > _____________________________ > > my commission expires ,

_________________
WITNESSES:


Moorish Science Temple of America, Inc.
Moorish Divine National Movement of North America

Canon-Affidavit: Right Travel/Affidavit Right to Travel
CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE:


Canon-Affidavit: Right Travel/Right To Travel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE: DMV > > > (Date 03/17/11) Certified Mail: _____________ > c/o __________________________ Ex. Corp. MICHAEL LEE GREEN/SEQEN REKHTU BEY near _________________________, Charlotte, NC Near _________, OHIO REPUBLIC, via. u.s.A. Postal-Zone ~ [ ] > NON-DOMESTIC > > -----CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE----- > > Department of Motor Vehicles > _____________________ ______________________,Oh > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: > > This is constructive LEGAL NOTICE to all elected, appointed or employed officials, including police officers, agents, or representatives of the city, county, state and/or federal government, including corporations and attorneys. > > That I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey, have secured the UNALIENABLE and FUNDAMENTAL, UNRESTRICTED and UNREGULATED RIGHT TO TRAVEL upon public walkways and highways, and transport my personal and allodial property LAND PORT VESSEL(S) VIN # .], duly conveyed, unhindered by ANY private, corporate or statutory law, or Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) regulation or requirement (See enclosed Affidavit: Right To Travel). > > That I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey, have revoked the Power of Attorney unknowingly and unintentionally granted to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV). That you can NO longer act on my behalf or take ANY action without my consent, without TRESPASS upon my person or property. > > That ANY action involving a citation or ticket, extortion, confiscation, impoundment or illegal adhesion contracts search and seizure of my private property by a police officers or ANY other public servant or employee will be considered a willful act to deprive me of my constitutionally protected RIGHTS, as an American, sovereign state Citizen. > > That action by a police officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to assert unlawful authority under the “color of law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my constitutionally protected RIGHTS and prosecuted to the full extent of American law. (Title 18, USC 241 and 242) > > Respectfully, > > > L.S.________________________- Citizen/Principal, Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, preceding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special > > CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE: Sheriff Officers / Polices > > Certified Mail: __________________________ > > Date: _______________________ > Appellation [Name]: _________________________________ > Location: _______________________________________________ > ________________________ u.s.A. Zip Exempt, [NON-DOMESTIC] > > -CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL NOTICE- > TO ALL SHERIFF OFFICERS / POLICES > > TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: > This is actual and constructive LEGAL NOTICE to all elected, appointed or employed officials including police officers, agents, or representatives of the City, County, State, States, Nations and/or federal government, including corporations and attorneys. That a police officer is an employee of a private corporation (Municipal, county, or state), and such has no personal immunity from acts committed upon this CITIZEN. > > This constructive LEGAL NOTICE submitted upon demand for a driver’s license, vehicle registration, or proof of insurance as part of the official record of ANY ensuing action and must be introduced as evidence in said action. You will be held responsible for all actions done knowingly and willingly towards this CITIZEN. You will be held responsible in both your individual and official capacity. I strongly advise you to proceed with caution and full knowledge of the consequences of your actions upon this CITIZEN. > > ANY action involving a citation or ticket issued, confiscation, or impoundment or illegal search and seizure of my private property by a police officer, or ANY other public servant or employee which carries a fine, jail time, or the posting of exorbitant bail, will be considered a penalty or sanction against this sovereign state CITIZEN. Thus you best have PROBABLE CAUSE that I have IN FACT, not in theory, committed a CRIME to justify such actions, and be willing to sign such INFORMATION under oath. > > I explicitly RESERVE, ASSERT, and DEFEND my RIGHT TO TRAVEL. I have exercised this RIGHT by expatriating from the U.S. citizenship of the federal, United States and all its political subdivisions, including Municipal, County, and State corporations. I, Seqen Rekhtu Bey, have reclaimed my lawful, sovereign state Citizenship of the Ohio Republic (1787). As such, I am a lawful CITIZEN, and you are my public servant having taken an oath to uphold the law of the land, the state, and federal constitutions. > > > > Take JUDICIAL NOTICE of the procedures concerning diversity of citizenship, the jurisdiction of subject mater, and persons required to appear. Corporate, administrative courts and tribunals have no original jurisdiction over sovereign state CITIZENS whatsoever. ANY citation or ticket is thus NULL and VOID and shall be REFUSED FOR CAUSE, WITHOUT DISHONOR. > > Under every circumstance without exception, government officials must hold the Ohio Constitution (1787) and the Constitution for the united states of America (1791) supreme over ANY other laws, regulations or orders. Every police or executive officer or judicial officer has sworn an oath to protect the lives, property and rights of the sovereign state Citizens of the united states of America under the supreme law of the land. ANY act to deprive sovereign state Citizens of their constitutionally protected rights is a direct violation of their oath of office, a felony, and a federal crime. I have given actual and constructive LEGAL NOTICE to the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV), and the Municipal, district, and county courts, of my RIGHT TO TRAVEL. I have also revoked their Power of Attorney. The court and its executive officers CANNOT lawfully act on my behalf, or take ANY action against me without my consent, without TRESSPASS upon my person or > property. > > This is the only constructive LEGAL NOTICE to be given. All other actions will be considered willful. The United States supreme Court has repeatedly asserted: > > “The officers of the law, in execution of process, are obliged to know the requirements of the law, and if they mistake them, whether through ignorance or design, and anyone is harmed by their error, they must respond in damages.” -Rogers v. Marshall (United States use of Rogers v. Conklin), 1 Wall. (US) 644, 17 L ed 714 > > “It is a general rule that an officer, executive, administrative, quasi-judicial, ministerial, or otherwise, who acts outside the scope of his jurisdiction, and without authorization of law may thereby render himself amenable to personal liability in a civil suit.” –Cooper v. O’Conner, 69 App DC 100, 99 F (2d) > > Any action by a police officer, officer of the court, public servant or government official to assert unlawful authority under the “color of law” will be construed as a direct and willful violation of my constitutionally protected rights and prosecuted to the full extent of American law. (Title 18 USC 241, 242; Title 42 1983, 1985 and other applicable laws of the united stated of America) > > “Public officials are not immune from suit when they transcend their lawful authority by invading constitutional rights.” –AFLCIO v. Woodward, 406 F2d 137. > > “Whoever under the color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any inhabitant of any state, Territory, or District to the deprivation of ANY rights, privileges or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution of laws of the United States…shall be fined not more than $1,000 or imprisoned not more than one year, or both…” -18 USC 242 > > I have NOW exercised the RESERVATION OF RIGHTS provided in the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) with IDENTIFICATION, whereby I may reserve my Common Law right NOT to be compelled to perform under any contract adhesion contract or agreement that I have not entered into knowingly, voluntarily or intentionally. And that reservation serves as LEGAL NOTICE upon all administrative agencies of government, federal, State, and local, that I do NOT, and will NOT accept the liability associated with the compelled benefit of any unrevealed commercial agreement. > > Respectfully, > > > > > L.S. Citizen/ Principal, by Special Appearance, in Propria Persona, proceeding Sui Juris, with Assistance, Special > > > > > > > > > SHERIFF OFFICER(S) / POLICE PERSON(S) > > I, , have read the above constructive LEGAL NOTICE, and am aware of its contents. NOTICE has been properly and duly served. > > Signature of Sheriff Officer / Polices: ________________________________________________________________________ > > Badge #: ¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬¬_____________ > > > > > [DATE] Certified Mail: ________________ > > STATE OF OHIO File No: ________ > Plaintiff, > > VS. > > _____________________________, Pro Per., “WITHOUT PREJUDICE” > Dissenting Accused > > --NOTICE OF DEFAULT— > > “The claim and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be converted into a CRIME.” – Miller vs. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > >

This is NOTICE that you are in DEFAULT to my AFFIDAVIT: RIGHT TO TRAVEL, sent by Certified Mail from the (USPS) United States Postal Service – and according to the their website; > www.usps.com (http://trkcnfrm: ) Label/Receipt Number:# .

Status: Delivered at on in OHIO CITY, OHIO 28214. > > > > Also, in the said Court, written AFFIDAVIT: RIGHT TRAVEL/RIGHT TO TRAVEL - WANT OF JURISDICTION on the part of the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF OHIO, INCORPORATED (Judge, Clerk of Court, District Attorney etc…), which is an instrument of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED required a returnable answer, rebuttal and defiance point by point – categorically sworn true, correct, certain, complete, the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth in the same manner as said Affidavits were served. However, since the Affidavit was never answered then the said Court concurred with my declarations and testimony in this matter. Your failure to respond or rebut by a returnable answer is taken as Silence. Thereby dismissing ALL proposed orders or judgments against me WITHOUT PREJUDICE. > “Silence can only be equated with fraud where there is legal or moral duty to speak, or where an inquiry left unanswered would be intentionally misleading.” - U.S. vs. Tweel (1977) 550 F 2d 297. > > “Where there is clearly NO jurisdiction over the subject matter, any authority exercised is usurped authority, and for the exercise of such authority, when the want of jurisdiction is known to the judge, NO excuse is permissible.” - Bradley vs. Fisher, 13 Wall 335, 352. > > Jurisdiction was NEVER proven! And because, it has NEVER been proven: “No sanction can be imposed absent proof of jurisdiction.” - Standard vs. Olsen, 74 S. Ct. 768 > > “Where RIGHTS secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be NO rule making or legislation, which would abrogate them.” - Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. > > “NO State entity has the power to allow or deny passage on the highways, byways, NOR waterways…transporting his vehicles and personal property for either recreation or business, but by being subject only to local regulation, i.e., safety, caution, traffic lights, speed limits, etc. TRAVEL IS NOT A PRIVILEGE REQUIRING LICENSING, VEHICLE REGISTRATION, OR FORCED INSURANCE.” - Chicago Coach Co. v. City of Chicago, 337 III. 200, 169 N. E. 22. > > “The court makes it clear that a license relates to qualifications to engage in profession, business, trade, or calling; thus, when merely traveling without compensation or profit, outside of business enterprise or adventure with the corporate state. NO LICENSE IS REQUIRED OF THE NATURAL INDIVIDUAL TRAVELING FOR PERSONAL BUSINESS, PLEASURE AND TRANSPORTATION.” - Wingfield v. Fielder 2d Ca. 3d 213 [1972] > > “REGULATIONS, FEES, TAXES, MAY NOT BE APPLIED TO NATURAL PERSON USING COMMON HIGHWAYS…” - Young v. Madison County, 115 N. > > On again, “A State (or the U.S.) may NOT impose a CHARGE for the enjoyment of a RIGHT granted by the Federal Constitution.” - Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 > > “The claim and exercise of a constitutional RIGHT can NOT be converted into a CRIME.” – Miller vs. U.S., 230 F 2d 486, 489 > > I hereby affix my autograph and official seal to all of the above affirmations with EXPLICIT RESERVATION OF ALL OF MY UNALIENABLE RIGHTS, WITHOUT PREJUDICE to any of those rights pursuant to U.C.C. 3-308, *U.C.C. 1-207 and U.C.C. 1-103.6. This includes, but is not limited to, the right to travel upon the public highways and transport my private property unhindered by corporate State regulations and statues that do not apply to sovereign, state Citizens and /or freepersons. > > Cordially, > > c/o Seqen Rekhtu Bey near ____________________________, Charlotte, NC Near _________, OHIO Republic, via u.s.A > Postal Zone [ ] Non Domestic > > > > Sworn, subscribed, sealed and affirmed before me this _______day of ___________2011. > > Notary Public for Colorado/Ohio Republic > _____________ > > my commission expires ________________ >
AND/OR > ________________ > WITNESSES: WITNESSES.